Zoznam úloh

A free online to-do list — no login, no account

This online to-do list is a full task manager that runs entirely in your browser — no sign-up, no account, no subscription. Every feature is available immediately: add tasks with a priority and a due date, drag them into the order that makes sense, tick them off as you go, and filter by All, Active or Done. Everything auto-saves to your browser's localStorage, so your list is waiting the next time you open the tab, even after a reboot.

The biggest practical difference from Todoist, Microsoft To Do or Google Tasks: you never need to log in. Those apps require an account and sync your data to a server. Todoist's free tier caps you at 5 projects. Microsoft To Do requires a Microsoft account. This tool keeps everything on your device — 100% private, 100% local, and fully functional offline once the page has loaded.

Daily and weekly templates to start instantly

The Quick templates row gives you four ready-made structures. Daily loads a morning-to-evening routine with focus blocks pre-tagged High priority. Weekly gives you a Monday-to-Friday planner with goal-review prompts. Study covers readings, assignments, exam prep and group-study slots. Priority implements an Eisenhower-inspired layout: Urgent+Important tasks flagged High, Important-not-urgent as Medium, and delegate-or-drop items as Low.

Each template adds tasks to your existing list rather than replacing it, so you can combine a Weekly structure with a handful of project-specific items. Once loaded, rename or delete template items and add your own — then click Print / PDF for a clean printable to-do list or daily planner you can take offline.

Drag and drop, priorities and due dates

Grab the handle on the left of any task to drag it into position — the new order saves automatically. Every task can carry a priority flag: High (red dot), Medium (yellow dot) or Low (blue dot), shown inline. Add a due date and tasks past their deadline turn their date label red so nothing slips through.

Double-click any task text to edit it in place. Priority flags and due dates are locked behind paid plans in apps like Any.do (priority) and Todoist (due dates on free tier). Here they are free. Together these three features — reorder, priority, due date — turn a simple checklist into a genuine daily planner without requiring a server or an account.

The 3-3-3 method — keep your list realistic

One practical way to use any to-do list is the 3-3-3 method: each morning, commit to 3 big tasks (must-do, High priority), 3 medium tasks (should-do, Medium priority), and 3 quick tasks (could-do, Low priority). That caps your daily list at nine realistic items instead of a backlog of 30 that never gets finished.

The Priority template loads this structure for you — just rename the placeholder tasks to match your actual work. The Active filter keeps done items out of sight so you only see what is left, and the coloured priority dots let you pick the most important task without thinking about it.

How this compares to Todoist, Notion and Google Tasks

Todoist is powerful but its free tier is genuinely limited: 5 active projects, no reminders, no filters. Notion is a full workspace product — great for documentation, overkill for a task list. Google Tasks requires a Google account and lacks drag-to-reorder, priorities and offline use. Microsoft To Do requires a Microsoft account and stores your data on Microsoft's servers.

This tool has one job: let you keep a list of tasks privately, without friction. No account, no sync to a server, no project limits, no locked features. If you want something you can open on any device without logging in — or want a to-do list app that works completely offline — this is the straightforward option.

Print a checklist, export JSON, and use offline

Click Print / PDF and your browser's print dialog opens showing only the task list — all controls hidden, just clean rows with checkboxes. On any modern browser, choosing 'Save as PDF' in the printer destination gives you a printable to-do list you can keep, share or fill in by hand.

Use Export JSON to download your list as a backup file and Import JSON to restore it on any device. Dark mode is one click and persists between visits. Because the tool is 100% client-side, it works completely offline once the page has loaded — no internet connection needed for saving, editing, printing or exporting. Works on iPhone, Android, desktop and tablet.

The psychology behind to-do lists: Zeigarnik, dopamine and open loops

In 1927, Soviet psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik published a finding that has shaped productivity science ever since: people remember interrupted or unfinished tasks significantly better than completed ones. She had noticed that restaurant waiters could recite an entire unpaid order from memory yet forgot the details the moment the bill was settled. Her lab experiments confirmed the pattern — incomplete tasks occupy an elevated state of mental activation, a phenomenon now called the Zeigarnik effect. The implication for daily life is that every commitment you haven't written down sits in working memory burning cognitive resources, generating low-level anxiety, and competing with whatever you are trying to focus on right now.

Writing a task down resolves that activation. The brain interprets the external record as sufficient evidence that the item won't be lost, and it releases the mental grip on it. This is the core mechanism behind David Allen's 'open loops' concept in Getting Things Done (2001): every unwritten commitment is an open loop draining mental RAM. Closing loops by externalising them to a trusted list — paper, app, or any consistent system — measurably reduces cognitive load and the ambient anxiety that comes with it. Research by Baumeister and Masicampo (2011) extended Zeigarnik's work to show that simply making a specific plan for an unfinished task (writing it down with a concrete next step) suppresses the intrusive thoughts, even before the task is done.

Checking a task off delivers its own neurochemical reward. Completing a discrete item triggers a small dopamine release in the brain's reward circuitry — the same pathway involved in other reinforcing behaviours. This is why crossing something off a list feels satisfying out of proportion to the effort involved: the brain is literally rewarding itself for the completion signal. That feedback loop is also why breaking large projects into small, concrete sub-tasks produces faster progress — each check-off is a micro-reward that sustains motivation across what would otherwise feel like an endless slog.

Task prioritization frameworks: Eisenhower Matrix, MoSCoW and beyond

Not all tasks are equal, yet most to-do lists treat them as if they were. The Eisenhower Matrix — attributed to a remark President Dwight Eisenhower reportedly made about having 'two kinds of problems: the urgent and the important' — separates tasks into four quadrants. Urgent and Important: do immediately. Not Urgent but Important: schedule deliberately (this quadrant contains most high-value work: strategy, relationships, health, learning). Urgent but Not Important: delegate if possible. Not Urgent and Not Important: eliminate. The matrix's key insight is that urgency feels like importance but often isn't — confusing the two is the most common reason high-value work never gets done.

The MoSCoW method, used widely in Agile software development, applies a similar four-way split to requirements and tasks: Must have (non-negotiable for the current sprint or deadline), Should have (high value but not blocking), Could have (desirable if time allows), and Won't have (explicitly deferred, not forgotten). Naming the 'Won't have' category is a deliberate act of scope control rather than passive neglect. For personal productivity, the ABCDE method popularised by Brian Tracy applies letter grades: A tasks have serious consequences if skipped, B tasks have mild consequences, C tasks have no consequences, D tasks should be delegated, and E tasks should be eliminated entirely. Doing any B or C task before all A tasks are cleared is the discipline failure most responsible for end-of-day regret.

Warren Buffett's '25/5 rule' takes a more radical approach to prioritisation. The story holds that Buffett asked his pilot to list 25 career goals, circle the top 5, then treat the remaining 20 not as a secondary list but as an active avoid-at-all-costs list — because those near-miss goals are compelling enough to demand attention and distract from the five that matter most. Applied to daily task lists: identify your three to five highest-leverage items first, then guard them against the plausible-but-lower-value work that expands to fill every available slot. A to-do list without explicit prioritisation is just an anxiety catalogue; a prioritised one is a decision-making instrument.

A brief history of list-making: clay tablets to GTD

The to-do list is older than alphabetic writing. Among the oldest surviving written documents — clay tablets from ancient Mesopotamia dating back roughly 4,000 years — are administrative lists: inventories of grain, records of labour obligations, accounts of goods owed. Lists were not incidental to early writing; they were the reason writing was invented. The cognitive need to externalise multi-item commitments predates literature, philosophy and mathematics. Leonardo da Vinci's notebooks, now held in institutional collections across Europe, contain famous to-do entries — 'describe the tongue of a woodpecker,' 'describe the jaw of a crocodile' — proof that the habit of capturing intellectual tasks in list form was as natural to a Renaissance polymath as it is to a modern office worker.

The industrialisation of work gave list-making a systematic framework. Frederick Winslow Taylor's scientific management (1911) introduced the idea that work tasks should be broken into discrete, measurable steps — a precursor to the modern project checklist. German sociologist Niklas Luhmann built an entire intellectual empire on a physical card index: his Zettelkasten, a box of 90,000 handwritten index cards organised by linked ideas, produced dozens of books and established one of the most influential systems for managing intellectual work before the digital era. The index card as a unit of discrete, portable, reorderable information is an analog ancestor of the digital task item.

The modern productivity movement crystallised with David Allen's Getting Things Done (2001), which sold over 1.5 million copies and spawned an entire consulting and software industry. GTD's central contribution was not the list itself but the capture habit and the weekly review: trusting an external system enough to actually empty your mind into it, then reviewing and updating it regularly so the system stays trustworthy. Without the review, a to-do list decays into a guilt register. With it, the list becomes a reliable external brain — freeing working memory for the creative and analytical work that actually requires human attention.

Cognitive science of procrastination, task decomposition and planning

Procrastination is an emotion-regulation failure, not a time-management failure — that is the consensus from over two decades of research led by psychologists including Pychyl and Sirois. People avoid tasks associated with negative emotions: boredom, frustration, self-doubt, anxiety about the outcome. The task's difficulty is secondary; its emotional valence is primary. This reframing has a concrete implication for to-do lists: a task stated as 'write quarterly report' sits on the list for weeks not because it is hard but because it is vague and anxiety-inducing. Rewriting it as 'open document and write a three-sentence introduction' gives the brain a specific, bounded action with a clear start and a visible finish, which removes the emotional avoidance trigger. Task decomposition — breaking abstract goals into concrete next actions — is the single most effective anti-procrastination technique available without any software, therapy or willpower.

The two-minute rule, popularised by GTD, addresses the opposite failure: over-managing trivial tasks. If a task will take less than two minutes to complete, do it immediately rather than writing it down. The overhead of capturing, reviewing and re-deciding costs more than the task itself. Applied consistently, the rule prevents to-do lists from becoming bloated with micro-items that create the illusion of a full productive day. Related to this is the planning fallacy — the near-universal human tendency to underestimate how long tasks will take, even for tasks performed repeatedly before. Research by Buehler, Griffin and Ross established that people are optimistic about their own timelines even when they can recall past overruns. The practical fix: add a 30–50% buffer to any duration estimate, and treat 'done' as 'done and reviewed' rather than just 'submitted.'

Finally, temporal landmarks explain the well-documented spikes in list-making and goal-setting that occur at the start of weeks, months, years and even birthdays — a phenomenon Hengchen Dai, Katherine Milkman and Jason Riis named the fresh-start effect (2014). These psychological boundaries create a sense that past failures belong to a previous 'chapter,' reducing the weight of prior inertia and increasing motivation to begin again. To-do lists made on a Monday morning or after a holiday are more ambitious and more likely to be followed for at least a few days than lists made mid-week with no transition marker. Knowing this, you can engineer your own fresh starts: a weekly Sunday-evening review, a 'season planning' ritual each quarter, or simply treating any morning as a new beginning rather than a continuation of yesterday's failures.